Guff AI ta ho niProject Turtle

Project Turtle / miss postgame analysis / July 3, 2026

Switzerland vs Algeria

This was the painful miss that made Turtle stricter. The raw ledgers made BTTS and high-total branches tempting, but the model did not sufficiently filter Algeria scoring evidence by opponent strength and Switzerland control.

Final: Switzerland 2-0 Algeria Working cloud: 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 3-2 Settlement: four-score miss Correction: clean-sheet strength gate
Raw Algeria scored84%
Raw Swiss conceded70%
Miss classClean sheet underweighted
New ruleStrength gate first

Pregame / postgame analysis

The failed claim and the correction sit together.

Postgame analysis note
Pregame analysisWorking cloud: 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 3-2.

The raw ledger gave a seductive argument: Algeria had scored in 84% of the last 50, Switzerland had conceded in 70%, Algeria BTTS was near half, and Switzerland BTTS was 60%. That made both-team-scoring branches look natural.

The weakness was portability. Turtle treated Algeria scoring frequency as if it transferred directly to this opponent class. It also treated Switzerland concession rate as broad evidence instead of asking whether Switzerland could control a weaker attacking profile in a knockout setting.

The pregame cloud therefore leaned too high: 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, and 3-2. The missing candidate family was Switzerland clean sheet: 1-0, 2-0, and 3-0.

Postgame analysisFinal score: Switzerland 2-0 Algeria.

Switzerland won 2-0. That result did not contradict the existence of Algeria's scoring history; it showed that the scoring history was not sufficiently opponent-adjusted.

The new rule is deterministic: before forcing BTTS or removing clean-sheet scores, Turtle must pass a strength gate. The gate checks opponent class, current tournament form, unit quality, and whether the weaker team's scoring record came against comparable opponents.

Evidence figures / last 50 rows

The tempting numbers were real, but incomplete.

Open postmortem

Last-50 tendency rates

Algeria scored
84%
Algeria BTTS
48%
Swiss scored
84%
Swiss conceded
70%
Over 3.5 combined clue
36-38%

These rates explain why the first read chased goals. The postgame analysis says they cannot be consumed without strength adjustment.

Mode diagnosis

SUI W
2-1, 3-0, 4-0, 4-1
SUI D
1-1, 0-0, 2-2
ALG L
0-2, 0-3, 0-1

The actual 2-0 branch existed in Algeria's loss family. Turtle failed to elevate it because BTTS evidence was allowed to dominate too early.

Rule carried forward

A team that scores often against weaker opposition does not automatically make BTTS live against a stronger control-side opponent. Clean-sheet branches need their own gate.